ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the risk of ocular adverse events after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination. DESIGN: Matched cohort and self-controlled case series (SCCS) studies. PARTICIPANTS: We used a population-based database of medical claims and vaccination records in a large Japanese city. In the matched cohort study, we identified individuals who received COVID-19 vaccination (BNT162b2) from February 2021 to September 2021. One control was selected from nonvaccinated individuals by matching time, date of birth, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and the enrollment period for health insurance. In the SCCS study, we analyzed individuals who developed ocular adverse events. METHODS: In the matched cohort study, we applied the Kaplan-Meier estimator to estimate the cumulative incidence of ocular adverse events over 21 days after the first dose and 84 days after the second dose. In the SCCS method, we used conditional Poisson regression to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ocular adverse events during the risk periods (0-21 days after the first dose and 0-84 days after the second dose) compared with the remaining periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite outcome of uveitis, scleritis, retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and optic neuritis. RESULTS: There were 99 718 pairs eligible for the matched cohort study after the first dose (mean age, 69.3 years; male, 44%). The vaccinated and control groups developed 29 and 21 events, respectively, over 21 days after the first dose, and 79 and 28 events, respectively, over 84 days after the second dose. The differences in cumulative incidence (reference, the control group) were 2.9 (95% confidence interval, -14.5 to 19.1) events/100 000 persons and 51.3 (16.2-84.3) events/100 000 persons, respectively, for the first and second doses. The SCCS study showed the IRRs of 0.89 (0.62-1.28) and 0.89 (0.71-1.11) for the first and second doses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The matched cohort analysis found an increased risk for the composite outcome after the second dose; however, the SCCS analysis showed no increased risk. Considering that the SCCS can cancel out time-invariant confounders, the current results suggest that COVID-19 vaccination is unlikely to causally increase the risk of ocular adverse events. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report the occurrence of posterior ocular adverse events following the administration of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: A retrospective consecutive case series, in which the medical files of patients presenting with ocular adverse events within 30 days of the vaccine inoculation, were analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients (2 females) were included in the study. The diagnoses included: posterior scleritis, paracentral acute middle maculopathy, herpes panuveitis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH)-like uveitis. Three of the patients had no relevant ocular history, but the patient who developed scleritis was in remission without medical therapy for four years, until the flare-up, which occurred one day after the vaccine. All patients improved with treatment. CONCLUSION: Though a causal relationship cannot be definitively established, the temporal relationship suggests a possible link between the COVID-19 vaccine and the posterior ocular complications. The benefits of vaccination clearly outweigh the potential adverse effects; however, ophthalmologists should be aware of the potential for vaccine-associated uveitis.
ABSTRACT
Background: Recent researches indicated that the ophthalmologic negative impacts of COVID-19 disease and COVID-19 vaccination are highly overlapping. Objective(s): The present study aimed to investigate the inflammatory side effects after COVID-19 vaccination. Patients and Methods: A total of (60) cases who received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine were included to report ocular side effects appeared within14 days of receiving the second dose. Result(s): Uveitis was recorded in (60%) of the study population after COVID-19 vaccinations, while the other inflammatory side effects were distributed as follows;scleritis (15%), VKH (10%), other effects (8.4%) and neuroretinopathy(6.6%). The majority (71.67%) of the study population was treated by corticosteroids. Visual acuity lowered <= 3 lines in (25%) of other inflammatory conditions;VA lowered > 3 lines in (25%) of other inflammatory conditions and (5.56%) of uveitis. Conclusion(s): Following COVID-19 vaccination, ophthalmologic inflammatory events are possible.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines have been reported to have ocular side effects including scleritis and episcleritis. PURPOSE: To report scleritis and episcleritis within a month following administration of COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: Retrospective case series. RESULTS: 15 eyes of 12 consecutive patients with scleritis and episcleritis from March 2021 to September 2021 were included. The mean time of onset of symptoms in patients with scleritis was 15.7 days (range, 4-30) and for episcleritis it was 13.2 days (range 2-30). Patients received COVISHIELD™ (10 patients) and COVAXIN™ (2 patients). Five patients had denovo inflammation and seven had recurrent inflammation. Episcleritis patients were treated with topical steroids and systemic COX2 inhibitors while patients with scleritis were treated with topical steroids/oral steroids/antiviral medications depending on the aetiology. CONCLUSION: Scleritis and episcleritis following COVID-19 vaccination are milder and do not require intensive immunosuppression except in rare cases.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report a case of posterior scleritis following COVID-19 vaccination. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. RESULTS: A 78-year-old female presented with headache and right-sided visual loss 10 days after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine. 'Examination showed disc oedema and a serous retinal detachment. B-scan ultrasound showed thickening of the posterior sclera with retroscleral fluid. CT head with venogram excluded venous sinus thrombosis. The patient's condition improved rapidly with oral corticosteroids with restoration of vision and resolution of disc swelling and serous detachment by 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior scleritis should be considered in patients presenting with headaches and blurred vision following vaccination. Timely diagnosis and treatment with corticosteroids can prevent permanent visual loss.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of anterior scleritis associated with uveitis in a referral center in Tunisia.Methods: The charts of twenty patients (20 eyes) diagnosed with sclero‐uveitis at Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia, presented between January 2015 and April 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. Detailed ophthalmic examination and fundus photography were performed in all patients. Mean follow‐up period was 28.4 months. Patients with keratitis or posterior scleritis were excluded.Results: There were eight women and 12 males patients with a mean age of 34.8 years. All patients presented with ocular pain. Mean initial best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/80 (range, 20/2000–20/25).There was an associated anterior uveitis in 80% of cases and panuveitis in 20%. Clinical findings at presentation included nodular scleritis in five eyes (25%) and scleromalacia perforans in four eyes (20%). Idiopathic sclero‐uveitis accounted for almost 55%. Identified causes of sclerouveitis included rheumatoid arthritis in four eyes (20%), tuberculosis in three eyes (15%), granulomatosis with polyangiitis in two eyes (10%), sarcoidosis in one eye (5%) and then one case after mRNA 1273 vaccine (5%). Ocular complications included pupillary seclusion in 25% of cases and vision loss in 10% of patients. Mean final BCVA was 20/100 (range, 20/4000–20/32). Treatment modalities of non‐infectious scleritis included indomethacine in 14 patients (82.3%), systemic corticosteroid in seven patients (41.1%) and immunosuppressant or biological agent in five patients (29.4%).Conclusions: Our results provide useful information about the patterns and etiologies of sclerouveitis. The leading causes of sclerouveitis include mainly rheumatoid arthritis and tuberculosis. An infectious cause should be always ruled out.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To report a case of reactive infectious mucosal eruption and anterior scleritis in a vaccinated patient following recent recovery from COVID-19. Reactive infectious mucosal eruption (RIME) is a newly recognised complication of SARS COVID-19. Scleritis has also been reported in COVID-19 infections;however, these cases were from early in pandemic prior to vaccine development and were not reported to occur concurrently with RIME. Method(s): This case report illustrates a 25-year old male fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (ComirnatyTM) who presented 2 weeks after recovering from COVID-19 infection with RIME involving the oral mucosal and larynx, and concurrent bilateral anterior necrotising scleritis. Result(s): Consultation was sought from ophthalmology, otolaryngology and dermatology and dental regarding diagnoses and management. The patient's condition rapidly improved following treatment with IV methyprednisolone and oral prednisone taper. Conclusion(s): In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, multidisciplinary collaboration is critical to achieve a timely diagnosis and prevent serious complications.
ABSTRACT
Purpose : Patients on systemic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) for uveitis are at higher risk of infection and infectious complications. While other medical specialties have studied the safety of IMT in non-ocular, autoimmune conditions vis-à-vis coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), little is known about the effects of these drugs in uveitis patients specifically. The objective of this study was to determine if uveitis patients with COVID-19 were at higher risk of hospitalization for this pandemic illness and whether systemic IMT affected this risk. Methods : Retrospective cohort study of uveitis patients in 2020 in the United States. The Symphony health insurance claims dataset was used. Inclusion criteria were an ICD10 code for COVID-19, a code for any form of non-infectious uveitis or scleritis, and age 18 or greater. Drugs studied included methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, adalimumab, infliximab, tocilizumab, rituximab, and JAK, IL-17, and IL-12/23 inhibitors. The main outcome measure was adjusted odds of hospitalization for COVID19. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for major risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease, including age, biological sex, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, and renal disease, obesity, organ transplant, stroke, and certain cancers. Results : 3,974,272 patients in the dataset were diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2020. Of these, 6389 (0.16%) had established diagnoses of uveitis or scleritis. Within the uveitis group, mean age was 54 years (SD 16), and 62% were female. 708 (11.1%) of the uveitis patients were hospitalized for COVID-19, significantly greater than the 7.3% rate amongst all adult, COVID-19-positive patients in the dataset (p < 0.001) and the CDC estimate of 7.5% for the US population in 2020 (p < 0.001). No agent showed a statistically significant effect on hospitalization. The higher rate of hospitalization in uveitis patients was partly, though not completely, explained by higher rates in uveitis-associated autoimmune conditions in the dataset as a whole. Conclusions : Uveitis patients have a greater risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 compared with the general population. As a whole, conventional IMT and biologics do not increase the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization amongst uveitis patients infected with the virus.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report three cases of ocular myositis and scleritis, bilateral scleritis and unilateral single muscle myositis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: Case series of three patients who presented to the Orbit Outpatient Service of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli with a history of unilateral proptosis, diplopia and pain, bilateral red eye and pain during eye movements and unilateral proptosis and inconstant diplopia respectively with onset 5-10 days after m-RNA COVID-19 vaccine. A thorough hematologic work up and orbital contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with proptosis was performed. RESULTS: Patients were females, 64, 58 and 45 years old respectively. MRI showed enlargement of all right rectus muscles, with both muscle belly and insertion involvement in the first case associated to right scleritis. A bilateral scleritis was diagnosed in the second patient and a single muscle myositis in the third patient. Serological tests excluded thyroid diseases. The first and second patient were treated respectively with oral and topical glucorticoids with a complete clinical response. Two 2 cycles of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were administered to the third patient with a partial response. CONCLUSION: As far as we know these are the first report of orbital myositis and scleritis presenting after mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273-(Moderna) vaccine, an uncommon effect of a likely autoimmune reaction triggered by the virus antigen.
ABSTRACT
Background: Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinfammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is a recently identifed disorder caused by somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene of myeloid cells. Various manifestations of pulmonary involvement have been reported, but a detailed description of lung involvement and radiologic fndings is lacking. Objectives: To describe lung involvement in VEXAS syndrome. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients iden-tifed at the Mayo Clinic with VEXAS syndrome since October 2020. Clinical records and chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans were reviewed. Results: Our cohort comprised 22 white men with a median age of 69 years (IQR 62-74, range 57-84). Hematologic disorders including multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome and pancytopenia were present in 10 patients (45%), rheumatologic diseases including granulomatosis with poly-angiitis, IgG4-related disease, polyarteritis nodosa, relapsing polychondritis, and rheumatoid arthritis were found in 10 patients (45%), and 4 patients had dermatologic presentations including Sweet syndrome, Schnitzer-like syndrome or drug rash with eosinophilia skin syndrome (DRESS). VEXAS syndrome-related features included fever (18, 82%), skin lesions (20, 91%), lung infiltrates (12, 55%), chondritis (10, 45%), venous thromboembolism (12, 55%), macrocytic anemia (21, 96%), and bone marrow vacuoles (21, 96%). Other manifestations observed were arthritis, scleritis, hoarseness and hearing loss. Median erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 69 mm/1st hour (IQR 34.3-118.8) and median C-reactive protein (CRP) of 55.5 mg/dL (IQR 11.4-98.8). The somatic mutations affecting methionine-41 (p.Met41) in UBA1 gene were: 11 (50%) p.Met41Thr, 7 (32%) p.Met41Val, 2 (9%) p.Met41Leu, and 2 (9%) in the splice site. All patients received glu-cocorticoids (GC) (median duration of treatment was 2.6 years);21 (96%) received conventional immunosuppressive agents (methotrexate, aza-thioprine, mycophenolate, leflunomide, cyclosporin, hydroxychloroquine, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib) and 9 (41%) received biologic agents (rituximab, tocilizumab, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, abatacept). Respiratory symptoms included dyspnea and cough present in 21 (95%) and 12 (55%), respectively, and were documented prior to VEXAS diagnosis. Most of the patients were non-smokers (14, 64%) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was present in 11 patients (50%). Seven patients (32%) used non-invasive ventilation, 6 used C-PAP, and 1 used Bi-PAP. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was available in 4 patients, and the findings were compatible with neutrophilic alveolitis in 3. Two patients had lung biopsies (2 transbronchial and 1 surgical) that showed ATTR amyloidosis and organizing pneumonia with lymphoid interstitial pneumonia, respectively. Pulmonary function tests were available in 9 (41%) patients and showed normal results in 5;3 patients had isolated reduction in DLCO and 1 with mild restriction. On chest HRCT, 16 patients (73%) had parenchymal changes including ground-glass opacities in 9, septal thickening in 4, and nodules in 3;pleural effusions were present in 3 patients, air-trapping in 3 patients and tracheomalacia in 1 patient. Follow-up chest HRCT was available for 8 patients (36%), the ground-glass opacities resolved in 5 patients, 3 patients manifested new or increased ground-glass opacities, and 1 patient had increased interlobular septal thickening. After 1 year of follow-up, 4 patients (17%) had died;3 due to pneumonia (2 COVID-19,1 bacterial) and 1 due to heart failure. VEXAS flares occurred in 18 patients (82%), the maximum number of relapses was 7, and they were mainly managed with GC and with changes in the immuno-suppressive regimen. Conclusion: Pulmonary involvement was documented by chest HRCT in most patients with VEXAS syndrome. Respiratory symptoms occurred in over one half of patients and about 20% had PFT abnormalities. The pulmonary manifestations of VEXAS are nonspecifc and characterized predominantly by infamma-tory parenchymal involvement.
ABSTRACT
A 14-year-old girl with bilateral chronic posterior scleritis was referred to us for poor control of ocular inflammation. There was an incidental finding of choroidal osteoma bilaterally whereby the choroidal mass in her right eye demonstrated a significant tumor growth in a short duration of two months. The right eye choroidal tumor was orangy in color with a well-defined margin, two-disc diameter in size, and located at the macula encroaching the fovea. Multimodal imaging assessments, including serial color fundus photo, enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT), and B scan ultrasonography monitoring, confirmed a continuous rapid growth of choroidal osteoma with episodes of scleritis flare-ups. Furthermore, intolerance toward second-line immunosuppressants and loss of follow-ups during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown led to frequent relapses of her posterior scleritis. Therefore, a new treatment plan was designed, and close monitoring of choroidal osteoma growth and control of posterior scleritis were initiated. Subsequently, bilateral posterior scleritis remained quiescent, and her vision remained stable with stagnant growth of choroidal osteoma.
ABSTRACT
CASE: A 48-year-old female with no medical history presented with 2 days of decreased vision in the right eye. She reported painless blurry vision that progressed to near complete vision loss. The vision loss was accompanied by one month of progressively worsening cough, body aches, and subjective fevers. She denied smoking and reported no sick contacts. Physical exam was notable for submandibular lymphadenopathy, bilateral conjunctival injection, and grossly decreased vision of the right eye. She also endorsed decreased sensation in bilateral lower extremities distally. Her initial labs showed leukocytosis (13), thrombocytosis (754), and elevated inflammatory markers (ESR 105 and CPR 359). A chest CT showed bilateral upper lobe consolidations and scattered mass like opacities bilaterally. Ophthalmic exam of the right eye revealed multiple small retinal infarctions consistent with paracentral acute middle maculopathy. A CT head was negative and TTE showed no vegetation. Additional testing revealed negative TB, COVID, and normal complements. Initial ANCA testing was negative, however a repeat test was strongly positive for ANCA with PR3 significantly elevated to 428. She was diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) vasculitis and treated with prednisone and started induction therapy of Rituximab. IMPACT/DISCUSSION: GPA is a small-medium vessel necrotizing vasculitis and the most common anti-neutrophil- cytoplasmic-antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis. GPA classically involves the upper respiratory tract, lungs, and kidneys referenced by the ELK criteria (ENT, Lung, Kidney) commonly used for diagnosis. ENT findings are present in 70-100% of cases with the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses most commonly involved. Roughly 50% have pulmonary involvement on presentation, as in this patient, while only 10-20% have initial renal involvement. A prodrome of systemic symptoms including body aches and fevers is often present. GPA is closely associated with c-ANCA, with autoantibodies to proteinase 3 (PR3) positive in over 80% of cases. This patient did have prodromal symptoms yet her primary presenting symptom of vision loss was atypical. Eye involvement is not part of the diagnostic triad yet it can occur in GPA. When it does present, it usually manifests as scleritis, conjunctivitis, or uveitis. Retinal infarctions, as seen in this patient, are uncommon and make this case an atypical presentation of GPA. Additionally, ANCA positivity is related to disease activity and a negative ANCA should not exclude GPA from a differential. Not all patients will be ANCA positive on initial presentation and 10% of patients with GPA will remain ANCA negative. CONCLUSION: Providers should consider atypical presentations of GPA in addition to the classic triad of ENT, Lungs, and Kidneys. Renal manifestations are often missing initially and involvement of other systems, such as ocular, can take place. With a positive c-ANCA and high clinical suspicion, treatment should not be delayed.
ABSTRACT
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a newly defined hyperinflammatory disease linked to antecedent coronavirus disease 2019. Patients with MIS-C present with various symptoms, and ocular findings such as mild bilateral conjunctivitis are relatively common. However, detailed descriptions of severe ocular reports associated with MIS-C are scarce in the current literature. Here we report a case of MIS-C in a Japanese boy, with severe eye manifestations in the form of anterior scleritis as the primary MIS-C symptom. Detailed ocular examinations by ophthalmologists may be key for clarifying the pathophysiology of MIS-C.
ABSTRACT
The Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA vaccine has shown excellent protection against the severity of COVID-19, yet adequate research on rare adverse events is lacking. Herein, we discuss the case of a 36-year-old female who had developed an urticarial polymorphous eruption, episcleritis, and inflammatory oligo-arthritis, in keeping with neutrophilic urticaria with systemic inflammation (NUSI), following the administration of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Investigations for other dermatological and rheumatological conditions were unremarkable, while multiple skin biopsies were highly suggestive of a neutrophilic drug reaction. To gain symptom control, our patient required multiple weeks off from work and was treated with several immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic agents. Further research with larger numbers is needed to identify adverse events more accurately, which will aid both in early diagnosis and prompt treatment for patients. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Our Dermatology Online / Nasza Dermatologia Online is the property of Our Dermatology Online and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe a case of anterior scleritis related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines appear safe; however vaccination has triggered thromboembolic events in predisposed patients. METHODS: A retrospective case report of anterior scleritis in a woman following administration of both ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine doses was studied by complete ophthalmologic examination and complementary tests. RESULTS: The patient has overcome SARS-CoV-2 infection a year prior. Ancillary tests including autoimmune and infectious diseases were negative. The chronology between ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine and the sequential episodes of scleritis may have a cause-and-effect relationship. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologists may be aware of scleritis as an ocular manifestation following ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccine, in otherwise healthy patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Scleritis , Female , Humans , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Scleritis/chemically induced , Scleritis/diagnosis , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Background: Children develop severe COVID-19 much less often than adults. However, a small proportion of children present with a complication, known as a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) sometimes associated with admission to an intensive care unit or death. Clinical presentation and consequences of MIS-C are still unclear. The aim of our study is to assess the features of MIS-C and its consequences on a child's health. Method: An observational longitudinal study of children and adolescents hospitalised from May 17 to October 26, 2020, with MIS-C to Morozovskaya Children's City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Department of Health Care, Moscow, Russia. Results: 37 children with MIS-C (meeting WHO, CDC, or RCPCH criteria) were hospitalised. The median age was 6 years (interquartile range 3.3-9.9 years), and 22 patients (59.5%) were male. The most common symptoms on admission were fever (97.3%), fatigue (86.5%), scleritis (85%), oral mucosal inflammation (83.8%), rash (70.3%), tachycardia (51.4%), nausea (51.4%), bilateral conjunctivitis (43.2%), cervical lymphadenopathy (43.2%). The most common laboratory abnormalities detected during hospitalization were elevated CRP (100%), ferritin (100%), D-dimer (89.19%), CRP (86.49%), platelets (85.49%), hypoalbuminemia (100%) and anemia (95.59%). EchoCG abnormalities were present in 6 (16.2%) children with evidence of myocardial dysfunction, 5 (13.5%)-pericarditis, and 3 (8.1%) with a coronary anomaly. The median time from discharge to the first follow-up was 15 days (interquartile range, 14-18 days) to the second follow-up was 47 days (interquartile range, 41-52 days). At the first follow-up, 7/33 (21.21%) children had at least 1 symptom, of whom 5 (15.15%) reported fatigue. At the second follow-up, only 1 child reported a symptom (rash). The normalisation of laboratory values and EchoCG findings was noted in all the children. Conclusion: In spite of the MIS-C severity, the tendency to fast regression of symptoms and laboratory and instrumental indexes is traced, which suggests recovery of children and adolescents from MIS-C without long-term consequences. Further long-term follow-up of patients with MIS-C is necessary since data on long-term health outcomes are limited.